MacPherson, Cameron
Impact of Antibiotic Treatment on the Gut Microbiome and Its Resistome in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
Nørgaard, Jens Christian
, Jørgensen, Mette
, Moestrup, Kasper Sommerlund
, Ilett, Emma Elizabeth
, Zucco, Adrian Gabriel
, Marandi, Ramtin Z
, Julian, Marc Noguera
, Paredes, Roger
, Lundgren, Jens D
, Sengeløv, Henrik
, MacPherson, Cameron
Antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections are increasingly an issue in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. How antibiotic treatment impacts antibiotic resistance in the human gut microbiome remains poorly understood in vivo. Here, a total of 577 fecal samples from 233 heavily antibiotic-treated transplant patients were examined using high-resolution prescription data and shotgun metagenomics. The 13 most frequently used antibiotics were significantly associated with 154 (40% of tested associations) microbiome features. Use of broad-spectrum $β$-lactam antibiotics was most markedly associated with microbial disruption and increase in resistome features. The enterococcal vanA gene was positively associated with 8 of the 13 antibiotics, and in particular piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin. Here, we highlight the need for a high-resolution approach in understanding the development of antibiotic resistance in the gut microbiome. Our findings can be used to inform antibiotic stewardship and combat the increasing threat of antibiotic resistance.
Early Stimulated Immune Responses Predict Clinical Disease Severity in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients
Svanberg, Rebecka
, MacPherson, Cameron
, Zucco, Adrian
, Agius, Rudi
, Faitova, Tereza
, Andersen, Michael Asger
, Da Cunha-Bang, Caspar
, Gjærde, Lars Klingen
, Møller, Maria Elizabeth Engel
, Brooks, Patrick Terrence
, Lindegaard, Birgitte
, Sejdic, Adin
, Gang, Anne Ortved
, Hersby, Ditte Stampe
, Brieghel, Christian
, Nielsen, Susanne Dam
, Podlekareva, Daria
, Hald, Annemette
, Bay, Jakob Thaning
, Marquart, Hanne
, Lundgren, Jens
, Lebech, Anne-Mette
, Helleberg, Marie
, Niemann, Carsten Utoft
, Ostrowski, Sisse Rye
Innate Immunity
Viral Infection
The immune pathogenesis underlying the diverse clinical course of COVID-19 is poorly understood. Currently, there is an unmet need in daily clinical practice for early biomarkers and improved risk stratification tools to help identify and monitor COVID-19 patients at risk of severe disease.
Readmissions, Postdischarge Mortality, and Sustained Recovery Among Patients Admitted to Hospital With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Moestrup, Kasper S
, Reekie, Joanne
, Zucco, Adrian G
, Jensen, Tomas Ø
, Jensen, Jens Ulrik S
, Wiese, Lothar
, Ostrowski, Sisse R
, Niemann, Carsten U
, MacPherson, Cameron
, Lundgren, Jens
, Helleberg, Marie
Many interventional in-patient coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) trials assess primary outcomes through day 28 post-randomization. Since a proportion of patients experience protracted disease or relapse, such follow-up period may not fully capture the course of the disease, even when randomization occurs a few days after hospitalization.Among adults hospitalized with COVID-19 in eastern Denmark from 18 March 2020–12 January 2021 we assessed all-cause mortality, recovery, and sustained recovery 90 days after admission, and readmission and all-cause mortality 90 days after discharge. Recovery was defined as hospital discharge and sustained recovery as recovery and alive without readmissions for 14 consecutive days.Among 3386 patients included in the study, 2796 (82.6%) reached recovery and 2600 (77.0%) achieved sustained recovery. Of those discharged from hospital, 556 (19.9%) were readmitted and 289 (10.3%) died. Overall, the median time to recovery was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 3–10), and 19 days (IQR: 11–33) among patients in intensive care in the first 2 days of admission.Postdischarge readmission and mortality rates were substantial. Therefore, sustained recovery should be favored to recovery outcomes in clinical COVID-19 trials. A 28-day follow-up period may be too short for the critically ill.